### Complex Numbers in Polar Coordinate Form

The form a + b i is called the rectangular coordinate form of a complex number because to plot the number we imagine a rectangle of width a and height b, as shown in the graph in the previous section.

But complex numbers, just like vectors, can also be expressed in polar coordinate form,  r ∠ θ . (This is spoken as “r at angle θ ”.) The figure to the right shows an example. The number r in front of the angle symbol is called the magnitude of the complex number and is the distance of the complex number from the origin. The angle θ after the angle symbol is the direction of the complex number from the origin measured counterclockwise from the positive part of the real axis.

For any complex number z, writing | z | denotes its magnitude. For example the four complex numbers 5 and −5 and 3 + 4 i and 5 ∠ 120°  all have magnitude 5 because they are all a distance 5 from the origin. Using magnitude notation we write | 5 | = 5 and | −5 | = 5 and | 3 + 4 i | = 5 and | 5 ∠ 120° | = 5.

### Polar → Rectangular Conversion

Suppose we have a complex number expressed in polar form and we want to express it in rectangular form. (That is, we know r and θ and we need a and b.) Referring to the figure we see that we can use the formulas:

### Rectangular → Polar Conversion

On the other hand, suppose we have a complex number expressed in rectangular form and we want to express it in polar form. (That is, we know a and b and we need r and θ.) We see that we can use the formulas:

Example: Convert the complex number 5 ∠ 53° to rectangular form.

Solution: We have r = 5 and θ = 53°. We compute a = 5 cos (53°) = 3 and b = 5 sin (53°) = 4, so the complex number in rectangular form must be 3 + 4 i.

Example: Convert the complex number 5 + 2 i to polar form.

Solution: We have a = 5 and b = 2. We compute
so the complex number in polar form must be 5.39 ∠ 21.8°.

Example: Convert the complex number −5 − 2 i to polar form.

Solution: We have a = −5 and b = −2. We compute
which is exactly the same answer as for the previous example! What went wrong? The answer is that the arctan function always returns an angle in the first or fourth quadrants and we need an angle in the third quadrant. So we must add 180° to the angle by hand. Thus the complex number in polar form must be 5.39 ∠ 201.8°.

### Multiplying and Dividing Complex Numbers in Polar Form

Complex numbers in polar form are especially easy to multiply and divide. The rules are:

• Multiplication rule: To form the product multiply the magnitudes and add the angles.

• Division rule: To form the quotient divide the magnitudes and subtract the angles.

Example: multiply (5 ∠ 30°) · (3 ∠ 25°)

(5 ∠ 30°) · (3 ∠ 25°) = (5·3) ∠ (30+25)° = 15 ∠ 55°

Example: divide 15 ∠ 32°  by  3 ∠ 25°

Example: divide 5 + 3 i  by  2 − 4 i

Just for fun we converted both numbers to polar form (with angles in radians), then did the division in polar, then converted the result back to rectangular form.

### Complex Numbers in Exponential Form

These rules about adding or subtracting angles when multiplying or dividing complex numbers in polar form probably remind you of the rules for adding or subtracting exponents when multiplying or dividing exponentials:
m · n = m + n   and   m / n = m − n.
They suggest that perhaps the angles are some kind of exponents. This guess turns out to be correct. We will prove in the next section that:
where as usual the base e is the number e = 2.71828… The form r e i θ is called exponential form of a complex number. The next example shows the same complex numbers being multiplied in both forms:
 polar form exponential form
Notice that in the exponential form we need nothing but the familiar properties of exponents to obtain the result of the multiplication. That is much more pleasing than the polar form where we have to introduce strange rules about multiplying lengths and adding angles.

### Proof of Euler’s Identity and Proof that  r ∠ θ  = r e iθ

The proof that  r ∠ θ  = r e i θ  requires the use of Euler’s identity, so we first state and prove Euler’s identity. Euler’s identity states that:
 Euler’s identity
This identity, due to Leonard Euler, shows that there is a deep connection between exponential decay and sinusoidal oscillations. To prove it we need a way to calculate the sine, cosine and exponential of any value of θ just like a calculator does. Taylor series provides a way.

The Taylor series for x is:
The notation 4! means 4 · 3 · 2 · 1, etc. The dots … indicate that the series (sum) goes on forever. The idea is that if we keep only the first few terms then we get an approximation for x. The more terms we keep the better the approximation. If we could keep all the terms then we would get the exact answer. For example e 1 or e approximated by just the first 5 terms is already good to about 3 significant figures:
There are similar Taylor series for sin(θ) and cos(θ) :
and
(Important Note: these two formulas for the sine and cosine assume that θ is measured in radians. Measuring θ in degrees would not make sense because then each term in the series would have different units and then they couldn’t be added.) To prove Euler’s identity we will manipulate the left side until it becomes equal to the right side. First substitute the series for x into the left side of Euler’s Identity, replacing x by i θ :
Now simplify and group all the real terms together and group all the imaginary terms together. We get:
Now notice that the terms in the first brackets are just the Taylor series for cos(θ) and that the terms in the second brackets are just the Taylor series for sin(θ). Thus we have converted the left side of Euler’s identity to read cos(θ) + i sin(θ) which equals the right side of Euler’s Identity. This ends the proof of Euler’s identity.

Now that we have Euler’s identity it is easy to prove that r ∠ θ  = r e i θ. Again we will manipulate the left side until it equals the right side. First, convert the left side to rectangular form:
Now factor out r and use Euler’s identity on the terms in the brackets.
The result is that we have converted the left side to equal the right side. This proves that r ∠ θ  = r e i θ

### Examples Using Rectangular, Polar and Exponential Form

When doing calculations with complex numbers which form should you use? Generally speaking use rectangular form for adding and subtracting, polar form for multiplying and dividing, and exponential for exponentiating or manipulating literal expressions. Here are some examples.

Example 1: Show that e i π = −1

Solution: Simply convert to polar and then to rectangular:

Example 2: Calculate i n for n = 1, 2, 3, …, plot the numbers on the complex plane, and spot the pattern.

 Solution: The pattern is easiest to spot in polar, where i = 1 ∠ 90°. Then: The plot is shown to the right. The various powers give a sequence of complex numbers that goes in a counterclockwise circle of radius 1 about the origin. After the 4th power the angle is greater than 360° but the counterclockwise pattern continues with new numbers falling on top of old numbers.

Example 3: Evaluate the exponential (3 + 4 i) (6 + 7 i)

Solution: Do the following manipulations:

 Convert the base to exponential form. Remember the angle must be in radians. The base now contains two factors. Apply the property of exponents (a b) m = a m · b m. Apply the property of exponents b m + n = b m · b n . Move the real factors to the front and evaluate them. Change the base from 5 to e by using the identity 5 = e ln(5). Combine the exponents and evaluate. Express the answer in exponential, polar or rectangular form.

Example 4: DeMoivre’s Theorem states that the equation  x n = C  (where C is any complex number and n is any positive integer has n complex roots (solutions) and that they are uniformly distributed in a circle about the origin of the complex plane.

Verify DeMoivre’s theorem for the equation  x 3 = 8  by finding all the roots.

 Solution: Obviously one of the roots is 2. According to DeMoivre’s theorem there are three roots and that all three are located uniformly in a circle about the origin as shown. That they are cube roots of 8 can be verified by cubing them. For example:

 Algebra Coach Exercises